Wednesday 26 June 2019

Sir Joseph Wilton Plaster Bust by Roubiliac at the Royal Academy Store



Sir Joseph Wilton
Plaster Bust 
by Louis Francois Roubiliac (1702 - 62).


Some notes:

Height 686 mm.

Given by Lady Frances Chambers in 1824

In the store of the Royal Academy.

It would seem that here is as good a place as any to post these photographs.


I am extremely grateful to Daniel Bowmar, Collections Manager of the Royal Academy for allowing me access to the Royal Academy Collection store in East London and for facilitating the photography.

The bust suffers from having been over painted in the late H block style.
It appears to have received some damage on the back of the neck.

Joseph Wilton trained as a sculptor with Laurent Delvaux at Nivelles in Flanders and from 1744 with Jean-Baptiste Pigalle in Paris. In 1747 he travelled to Rome and then about 1750 moved to Florence. 

He returned to England in 1755 with the architect William Chambers, whose friendship helped him to gain patrons. In 1766 he carved the life-size marble of George II in the Senate House, Cambridge. 



Wilton was one of the Foundation Members of the Royal Academy in 1768, and in 1790 became Keeper of its collections.































Evidence of damage on the back of the neck.

______________






























________________


Bronze bust of Joseph Wilton. 
Taken from the Royal Academy Plaster bust in 1928.


          840 mm x 550 mm x 330 mm,
Made in-house Royal Academy of Arts (London) 1928.


























___________________







National Portrait Gallery

______________________




Joseph Wilton
attrib. Charles Grignion (1753 - 1804).
136 x 114 mm
c.1771

National Portrait Gallery
__________________





Sir William Chambers; Joseph Wilton; Sir Joshua Reynolds
by John Francis Rigaud
1782
1181 mm x 1435 mm.
NPG 987

Inscription
Signed and dated bottom left: J. F Rigaud/1782.
National Portrait Gallery



From the left - Sir William Chambers (1723-96): grey eyes, grey powdered wig, wearing the Polar Star on his green coat with silver buttons bearing a gold device; gold brocade waistcoat and grey-green breeches; his right elbow rests on a capital and in his right hand a T-square; he points with his left hand to a plan [1] on which lie dividers.

Joseph Wilton (1722-1803): his dark eyes apparently focused on Chambers’s badge of the Polar Star; grey powdered wig, wearing a sandy-brown coat with matching buttons and a yellow green-striped waistcoat; in his right hand a mallet, his left stretched out towards the distant figure of the Apollo Belvedere. [2]

Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-92): blue eyes, grey powdered wig, wearing a matching coat and waistcoat of red with gold buttons, trimmed with dark fur; he leans on a folio of drawings and sits in a blue-upholstered chair.
Compared with Rigaud's earlier group portrait of the three Italian Academicians (see NPG 3186), the canvas is slightly larger and the composition more successful. The artist's son explained that NPG 987 was ‘intended as a companion' and was

'a very interesting group of Sir Joshua Reynolds, the first and distinguished President of the Royal Academy; J. Wilton R.A. Sculptor (afterwards Keeper of the Royal Academy;) and Sir William Chambers R.A. Architect, and Surveyor of the Board of Works: They are represented as in conversation, Sir Joshua in the act of addressing his brother artists, with all the gentleness and suavity for which he was so remarkable, thus giving a perfect idea of his countenance, his expression and character.' [3]

He even preferred his father's portrait of Reynolds to the self portrait Reynolds presented to the RA (as a Doctor of civil law 1780), as 'a more true representation of his personal appearance, and his peculiar expression' (the Rigaud head somewhat resembles the Reynolds self portrait of 1773, of which, however, there was no early engraving). Of contemporary reviews the St James’s Chronicle, 2-4 May 1782, agreed that ‘They are strong and expressive Resemblances; but the Integrity which led the Artist to copy so exactly the Vulgarity of the President’s Countenance will not recommend him to his Favour; and he will probably remain some Time longer among the Associates’. But Rigaud was elected RA in 1784.
This uncommissioned picture portraying three senior Royal Academicians (of similar age, eminent representatives of the arts of sculpture, architecture, and painting, was evidently an exercise in self-advertisement. It may also celebrate the move of the Royal Academy in 1780 to rooms in Somerset House, the masterpiece of Chambers, in which Wilton undertook much decorative carving. [4] Both architect and sculptor had long been distinguished by Royal patronage. The elegant Wilton, to be elected Librarian and Keeper of the Royal Academy in 1786 and 1790 respectively, had been appointed sculptor in ordinary to the King in 1761. Chambers, Knight of the Polar Star, had come to dominate the Office of Works since his initial appointment (as Treasurer) in the Instrument of Foundation of the Royal Academy. In 1782 he was appointed first surveyor-general and comptroller of the Office of Works. Reynolds, elected first President of the Academy and knighted in 1769, would not be further distinguished by the King until 1784 when he succeeded Ramsay as Principal Painter. He had previously painted the young Wilton in Florence in 1752 (NPG 4810) and had painted Chambers in 1756 (NPG 27), and 1777-80 (a portrait commissioned by the Royal Academy). In 1771 Chambers had designed for him Wick House at Richmond. But the President remained a little in awe of his well-established Treasurer and Wendorf has observed that Rigaud’s group hints at uneasiness, the central cluster of gesturing hands suggesting the two are essentially at cross purposes, 'engaged in an administrative stand off'. [5]

Footnotes
1) 'A plan for a small structure approached by flight of stairs and entered through a lie of four closely packed columns. A casino? A temple? A belvedere to house the Belvedere? The original drawing does not seem to have survived’ (N. Bingham, Country Life, CLXXXV, 1991, p 54).
2) Of which he acquired a cast in 1754 and copied for the Duke of Richmond c.1760.
3) W. L. Pressly ed., 'Facts and Recollections of the XVIIIth Century in a Memoir of John Francis Rigaud Esq., R.A.', by Stephen Francis Dutilh Rigaud, Wal. Soc., I, 1984, p 68.
4) For their collaboration see J. Coutu in J. Harris & M. Snodin eds., Sir William Chambers, 1996, pp 175-85.
5) R. Wendorf, Reynolds, 1996, p 185.

Reference
Coutu 1996
J. Coutu in J. Harris and M Snodin eds., Sir William Chambers, 1996, p 183.

Provenance
Rigaud sale, Peter Coxe, 2nd day, 4 April 1811, lot 81; Montagu Chambers QC (grandson of Sir William); his sale, Christie’s, 9 July 1886, lot 109, bought Wertheimer; James Price sale, Christie’s, 15 June 1895, lot 60 (as Reynolds, J. Bacon and Sir W. Chambers), purchased.

Exhibitions
RA 1782 (111); RA 1879 (172 as Zoffany) lent Montagu Chambers; Bicentenary Exhibition, RA, 1968-69 (34); Sir Joshua Reynolds: The Self Portraits, Sudbury, Plymough, 1992 (32); Chambers, London, Stockholm, 1996-97; Art on the Line, Courtauld Gallery, 2001 (9).


This extended catalogue entry is from the out-of-print National Portrait Gallery collection catalogue: John Ingamells, National Portrait Gallery: Mid-Georgian Portraits 1760-1790, National Portrait Gallery, 2004,

National Portrait Gallery



____________________________








Portrait of Joseph Wilton, R.A., 30 March 1793
George Dance RA (1741 - 1825)

 Royal Academy


Drawing above and text below from the Royal Academy website.

A profile portrait of the sculptor Joseph Wilton, R.A. (1722-1803). This portrait is unusually colourful for one of Dance's 'heads'. The artist sometimes added colour to the cheeks, lips or nose but here he also coloured the jacket and part of the chair with a light pink/beige hue. It is possible that some of these features were added later by another hand.

Wilton trained in France and studied antique sculpture in Italy. On his return to London he and Cipriani were put in charge of the cast collection at Richmond House and he also became a founder member of the Royal Academy. Wilton collaborated on decorative designs with the fashionable architects Robert Adam and Sir William Chambers. His extravagant lifestyle often detracted from his work but he was nonetheless appointed Sculptor to George III in 1761 and held two important posts in the Academy - Librarian (1786-90) and Keeper (1790 until his death).

This drawing was reproduced in soft-ground etching by William Daniell and published on 15 March 1810.

Between 1793 and 1810, George Dance produced 53 profile portraits of his fellow Academicians. Dance, an architect by profession, made it his hobby to draw portraits of friends and well-known figures, providing what he called 'a great relaxation from the severer studies and more laborious employment of my professional life'.
However, the project to record the profiles of his fellow Academicians probably had a more serious commemorative impetus as Dance began this project in 1793 - the silver jubilee of the Royal Academy's foundation - and the majority of the portraits date from that year. Those drawn subsequently appear to have been part of a less concentrated attempt to record new members or to catch up on those who had been missed out in the initial series. Only two Academicians who were resident in Britain at the time were not drawn by Dance - Mary Moser and P. J. de Loutherbourg. Almost all of the drawings show the sitters in profile though there are some slight variations such as the portrait of Richard Cosway (03/3260) who is seated in a frontal pose with his head turned to the side (see also Thomson 04/1249, Opie 03/2666, Richard Westall 03/2657, Smirke 03/2655 and Nollekens 03/2650).

Although it was announced in The Oracle in 1793 (24th April 1793) that 'Mr George Dance the Architect has been drawing the profile portraits of the Academicians', the minutes of the General Assembly and the Academy's Council do not record any resolutions regarding these activities. Dance's private project could nevertheless have been officially supported or recognised by the institution. The uniform nature of these profile portraits had the advantage of being very democratic and, unlike other commemorative initiatives, giving each member equal merit.

Joseph Farington, a fellow RA, took a particular interest in Dance's project. His assistance in organising sittings for Dance and helping to arrange the drawings into 'volumes', is recorded in his famous diaries. This activity seems to have been closely linked to his own efforts to compile biographical information on living and dead artists, presumably with a view to publishing a history of the Academicians.

In July 1797, Farington's diaries record that he and Dance had been arranging the portraits into two volumes and were in discussion about how they should be bound. Markings on the original mounts suggest that the drawings were indeed bound although these bindings no longer survive. This is confirmed by J. H. Anderdon's recollection that he viewed some of Dance's heads in a bound volume in the RA Library in 1849 and 1864. Dance and Farington may have been trying to interest the Academy, or at least other Academicians, in their venture as Farington records that on January 29th 1799 that 'Fuseli and Mrs Fuseli, Opie and Mrs Opie drank tea with us - to see the Academy portraits by Dance' (Farington p. 1149). Although this activity did not result in a biographical publication, the idea evidently remained current for some time as, seven years later on December 31st 1806, Farington recorded that 'Dance called to desire me to have his collection of Portraits & to assist. with Biography. - Had doubts abt. World's [probably referring the publication of that name] remarks abt. it being out of his line - but now at time of life to pay little regard to such remarks to avoid [illegible] & to seek for ease & amusement etc'.

Although Farington's biographical work was never published, he and Dance were considering having the profile portraits engraved from as early as 1794. Farington's diary shows that on 9th August of that year Dance was already in discussion with an engraver on this matter. The engraver's name is not specified but in November the same year John Ogbourne had engraved Dance's profile of Lord Camden and was about to start work on that of Sir William Chambers. However, 72 of Dance's portaits were etched by William Daniell , including 16 of the Academicians' portraits, and were published along with brief biographical notes from 1802 onwards in 12 monthly parts and a further set of 142 unbound prints was published in 1851. The reaction to the original publication of Dance's profiles seems to have been positive but Farington recorded that 'Dance told me Landseer had in a Quarterly Critique been criticising His publication of Heads, & "That the eyes were too small, not like anything in nature in the proportions & that there was a want of Skull to the Heads" ' (10th May 1809) .

Related Objects:

There are 38 portrait drawings by Dance in the National Portrait Gallery collection, 41 in the British Museum, a small number at the V&A, Tate Britain and the John Soane Museum.

________________________

A Mantelpiece designed by Wilton

Design for a Chimneypiece at Goodwood



Gray wash and graphite with pen and black ink and pen and brown ink on medium, slightly textured, cream laid paper
Dimensions        Sheet: 22.9 × 29.5 cm.
Inscribed in pen and brown ink, lower left: "A | 1:3 [...]"; center: "4 feet opening 4:0"; lower center: "A Mantelpience Designed by Wilton R.A."
Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection.






Sunday 23 June 2019

The Busts of Oliver Cromwell, Part 23. The Royal Academy Plaster bust by Joseph Wilton.


The Busts of Oliver Cromwell, Part 23.

The Royal, Academy Plaster Bust by Joseph Wilton.

I am extremely grateful to Daniel Bowmar, Collections Manager of the Royal Academy for allowing me access to the Royal Academy Collection store in East London and for facilitating the photography.


The bust is stencilled on the socle with the number 106.

I have already posted on the Wilton busts of Cromwell see -

http://english18thcenturyportraitsculpture.blogspot.com/2019/02/oliver-cromwell-marble-bust-by-joseph.html




Top Royal Academy Plaster.
Middle - V and A - Government Art Collection.
Bottom - Anglesey Abbey - Huntingdon Cromwell Museum.


There was another of these busts mentioned in the Biographical Dictionary.... at one time at Donington Park.

___________

The V and A bust and the Government Art Collection busts appear to be virtually identical

The Anglesey Abbey bust has the wide leather sash belt - the Huntingdon has an undecorated sash belt.



At first glance these busts appear the same but there are a few minor differences the armour on the right hand proper arm and the rivets on the armour on the chest on the right hand proper are missing.
The vein on his left hand foreheads and the wart over his eye are better defined on the plaster

The bust in the Government Art Collection is as far as I can tell an almost exact replica of the V and A bust - currently the only photograph available of the Government bust is a low resolution image from their website - but it is clear enough to show that they are more or less the same

These differences suggest that the plaster was derived from a now missing terracotta prototype from the Wilton Studio

The shape of the socle is also telling suggesting again that the cast is 18th century. 

If this is the case then it is a very fortunate survival

I was unable to make any real forensic investigation into this bust - I will put down my first thoughts here. It appears to have sustained some damage in the past and this has been disguised by the bronze paint - in the past it has not been particularly well treated and appears to have water staining on the surface.

There are what appears to be piece mould marks, visible particularly on the face, and it has probably been broken and restored at some point and it is difficult to make out whether the lines on the face and hair are piece mould marks or breaks that have been restored or a mixture of the two.   





___________________

Bust of Oliver Cromwell
Joseph Wilton
Marble Bust

Dimensions height: 75.00 cm, width: 58.00 cm.

The Government Art Collection.

images here below from the Government Art Collection Website:


Provenance - with dealers Montague Marcussen Limited; 

from whom purchased by the Ministry of Works in April 1947.
Inscription I. Wilton F:t

Current Location?  Cabinet Office, 70 Whitehall (London, UK).
















Photographs of the details above of the Government Art Collection Bust of Cromwell by Wilton.


A Cromwell bust by Wilton is described at Donington Park by J. Throsby in his Select Views in Leicestershire of 1790, and he adds that this bust 'secured the artist an honourable employment under his present Majesty'.

Joan Coutu states that this is the bust originally at Donington Park in Then and Now: Collecting and Classicism in Eighteenth-Century England By Joan Coutu pub. 2015.



She also mentions that Walpole recorded the inscription on the bust when he visited Donington in 1768.



Classical Sculpture and the Culture of Collecting in Britain since 1760 By Viccy Coltman mentions the bust of Cromwell along with a bust of Peter the Great by Wilton in the Gothick Hall at Donington Park Leicestershire  In the drawing Room at Donington were busts of Francis First Earl Huntington and Dr Cocchi and busts of Pythagorus and Epicuras by Simon Vierpyl.



____________

There is a terracotta version of the bust of Cromwell at the V and A (no photographs currently available).
Height: 66.7 cm from bottom of base to top of bust, Height: 13.3 cm of base.

This bust is related to the marble bust executed by Joseph Wilton in 1762, also in the museum collection (V&A-Mus-No: A.32-1930). Although it was originally suggested that the terracotta was a model it is now thought that the finished condition of the terracotta suggests that it may well be cast after the marble.
Bequeathed to the V and A by Rupert Gunnis, Esq, Hungershall Lodge, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, author of the first Dictionary of English sculptors pub 1954. 

The present piece was covered in white paint, which was removed by the Conservation Department in July 1965.


see - http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O312571/oliver-cromwell-bust-wilton-joseph-ra/





_______________







































The line down the centre of the nose is perhaps a piece mould mark.

________________



Water staining clearly visible on the right side proper of the face.

_______________








It is difficult to identify whether the lines on the hair are piece mould marks or breaks disguised by the bronze colour paint or a mixture of the two.

______________




There appears to be a restoration under the chin - the marks look like some sort of bandage fabric disguising a repair.














The significance of the stencilled number has yet to be clarified.
____