The Art UK Sculpture Project -
The First Images go online -
Sir William Fermor (1621 - 61),
and Mary Fermor (1628 - 70).
A Pair of Plaster Busts
from Easton Neston House, Northamptonshire.
Currently attributed to Peter Besnier.
https://www.artuk.org/discover/artworks/sir-william-fermor-16211661-244629
These are the first 17th century portrait busts posted by Art UK sculpture project and it is excellent to be able to acknowledge the initiation of this project by posting the accompanying photographs from their website.
____________________
I have already published at some length on the Besnier Family of Sculptors see -
The Monument to Richard Weston in Winchester Cathedral -
http://english18thcenturyportraitsculpture.blogspot.com/2017/11/monument-to-richard-weston-ist-earl-of.html
http://english18thcenturyportraitsculpture.blogspot.com/2017/11/busts-of-sir-william-fermor-and-his.html
_________________
A brief look at the works of the Besniers.
The busts of the Fermors were sold at Sotheby's Easton Neston House sale, Lot 12 - 17th May 2005.
Bought with the aid of an Art Fund grant by Northampton Museum and
Art Gallery.
Entry below from The Biographical Dictionary of Sculptors
available online at -
http://liberty.henry-moore.org/henrymoore/sculptor/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=190&from_list=true&x=13
Peter Besnier (Bennier) - A French sculptor and the brother of
Isaac Besnier, who had collaborated with Hubert le Sueur on the monument to
George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, erected in Westminster Abbey in 1634.
Peter Bennier may have been trained in France but was living in England before
October 1643, when he was appointed sculptor to King Charles I. He was required
to look after the ‘Moulds, Statues and Modells’ in the Royal collection, a duty
previously performed by his brother, in return for the use of a house and £50
pa from the privy purse.
The Civil War prevented him from taking up his duties and he was
deprived of his office during the Commonwealth. At the Restoration he
petitioned to be reinstated on the grounds that the late King had granted him
the ‘place of sculptor to His Majesty and the custody of his statues, etc, but
by reason of the most unhappy distraction befallen since, hee injoyed not the
same place, but was reduced into very great poverty and want through his
faithfulness and constancy’ (TNA SP 29/2, no 66-1, quotedby Faber 1926, 14).
His request was granted on 15 March 1661 (TNA, LC3/25, 113, cited by Gibson
1997 (1), 163) and he held the post until his death, when he was succeeded by
Caius Gabriel Cibber.
Bennier is listed as a ratepayer of Covent Garden, 1649-51, and
among the Ashburnham Papers is a reference to a tenement occupied by Bennier
near Common Street in 1664 (LMA, ACC/0524/045,046,047, 048, cited by Gibson
1997 (1), 163).
It has been tentatively suggested that he worked for Hubert
le Sueur. He signed the monument with a ‘noble’ portrait-bust to Sir Richard
Shuckburgh (1) (Gunnis 1968, 50).
The monument to Sir Hatton Fermor at Easton Neston, Northants, has
been attributed to him because the bust is similar to the Shuckburgh one and
the two families intermarried.
In 1655 Bennier was employed at Lamport Hall, Northants, carving
shields and ‘pictures’, which were probably statues (Northants RO, IL 3956,
cited by White 1999, 11, 12 n 10-11) (2). He also did unspecified work for the
crown at Somerset House in 1661-2.
Gunnis 1968, 50;
Colvin V,
1973-6, 255;
Whinney 1988, 90, 93, 439 n 16, n 21, 440 n 2-3;
McEvansoneya
1993, 532-5;
Grove 3, 1996, 875
(Physick);
White 1999, 11-12
see -
http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.12.html/2005/sale-at-easton-neston-l05500
A pair of plaster busts of Sir William Fermor, 1st bt.
(1621-1661) and his wife Mary (1628-1670), daughter of Hugh Perry, attributed
to Peter Besnier (French, d.1693),
1658
The attribution rests on physiognomic and stylistic
comparisons as well as contextual evidence. The expressive modelling of the
heads with their animated features are more advanced than the work of Besnier’s
predecessor as Court Sculptor, Hubert Le Sueur, whose portraiture has been
rightly criticised for having a ‘curiously inflated appearance’. The angle of
the heads are more accentuated than the iconic frontality found in Le Sueur’s
busts. In their sense of movement they are much less mannered and the richly
modelled sash, drapery and hair - notably to the bust of Mary - imbue them with
a liveliness derived from the Italian Baroque.
In this connection one might at first think of two other
sculptors active in Caroline England, namely the Italian, Francesco Fanelli
(1577-after 1641) and the Fleming, Francois Dieussart (c.1600-1661). Whinney,
who was the first to raise the possibility that Besnier may have been the
sculptor responsible for the Easton Neston busts, observed that they were
‘closer to the style of Dieussart’ (op.cit. p.440, note 2). There is no
specific comparison to be made in support this hypothesis, unless Whinney was alluding
to their advanced baroque naturalism: Dieussart was perhaps the most talented
of the foreign sculptors lured to London having spent the years 1622-1630 in
Rome assimilating the latest developments in Baroque sculpture.
However Dieussart had departed for The Hague in 1641, well
before the Easton Neston busts could have been modelled, and the same year also
marks the last recorded reference to Fanelli in England.
It is Peter Besnier’s elder brother Isaac (active
1631-c.1642) who therefore provides the point of departure for a meaningful
stylistic comparison, and one that can be seen to reinforce Whinney’s initial,
if instinctive, placement of the busts in the Besnier orbit.
Isaac Besnier was first employed to look after the ‘Moulds,
Statues and Modells’ in the royal collection but his major sculptural
contribution is to be found in the realm of monumental tomb sculpture of the
1630’s. He collaborated with Le Sueur on the tombs of three of the greatest
personalities of the Caroline Court: that of the Earl of Portland in Winchester
Cathedral; and those of the Duke of Buckingham and the Duke of Richmond and
Lennox in Westiminster Abbey. While Le Sueur cast the figures and effigies in
bronze, Isaac carved the architectural marble components, including the
statuary and tablets. Indeed Lightbown credits him for a significant part of
their overall design. It is interesting
to hypothesise how the commission for the busts came about. Each portrait bears
the date 1658, an inauspicious time for sculptor and patron alike.
Sir William Fermor was the elder son of Sir Hatton Fermor
and his wife Anne Cockayne. At the
outbreak of the Civil War he and his younger brother Hatton joined the
King. William was created a baronet by
King Charles 1641: his younger brother was less fortunate dying for the
Royalist cause at Culham Bridge in 1645.
Sir Williams's marriage was very much a reflection of his
loyalties. His wife Mary Perry was the
widow of the Hon. Henry Noel who had died a prisoner of the Parliamentarians.
His brother Baptist Viscourt Campden was a colonel in the Royal Horse Regiment.
During the years of the Interregnum Sir William had had to
compound for his estate and was under constant suspicion of agitation. In 1653
he was summoned before the council and in 1655 he was accused of killing the
Protector’s deer. In 1658, the year of his portrayal, he was publicly listed as
a Northamptonshire royalist without military rank. Besnier too suffered
hardship, having been deprived of his office of court sculptor, which he had
held since 1643, by the Parliamentarians. In his petition for reinstatement at
the Restoration, he claimed that he had fallen into ‘very great poverty and
want’ (see White op.cit.). However the evidence suggests the opposite was true.
In 1655 he was carving statues and shields for John Webb’s revisions to Lamport
Hall, Northamptonshire (not far from Easton Neston) and in the following year,
1656, he was working on his only signed and securely attributed work, the
monument to Sir Richard Shuckburgh, just across the border in Warwickshire.
These commissions, together with the present plaster busts, perhaps intended as
presentation models for finished bronzes, show that Besnier was not as close to
the ‘great poverty’ he claimed to be. If it was not his work at Lamport that
brought him to the attention of Sir William, it must have been owing to the
Shuckburgh monument that artist and patron became acquainted. Sir William’s
sister Katharine was married to Sir John Shuckburgh, Sir Richard’s son and heir
(see White op.cit., p.12), which provides a convenient avenue for their
introduction.
Whinney, followed by White, attributes the posthumous
monument to Sir Hatton and Lady Fermor in St. Mary’s Church, Easton Neston, to
Peter Besnier. The memorial also commemorates Sir William, whose marble bust
appears between the two figures of his parents. This bust bears no relation to
the present plaster and is of a much inferior standard of execution. The
general design of the monument, with its three effigies of Sir Hatton’s
daughters arranged at the very top, recall his brother Isaac’s work of the
1630’s for the Earl of Portland. The tablet inscription nonetheless dates it to
1662, a year after Sir William’s death and at a time when Peter Besnier is
documented in London working in his court capacity at Old Somerset House.
__________________________________
Whinney notes that the only signed monument by Peter Besnier
- the monument to Sir Richard Shuckburgh d. 1656 at Shuckburgh, Warwickshire is
similar in style to the Fermor monument at St Mary's Church Easton Neston,
Northamptonshire (see below) - the two families were related by marriage.
I have not yet been able to locate a good photographs of
either of these monuments.
The Paragraph below from British History online from - A
History of the County of Warwick: Volume 6, Knightlow Hundred. Originally
published by Victoria County History, London, 1951.
The south chapel (12 ft. 6 in. by 9 ft. 2 in.) is similar to
the one on the north. Against the east wall is a large marble memorial to
Richard Shuckburgh, died 1656. It has a classic pediment with the Shuckburgh
coat in the tympanum, surmounted by three urns, and below a portrait bust
flanked by angels with trumpets holding back curtains. Underneath there is a
carved panel with inscription, under a pediment of scrolls with a skull on
either side. It rests on a carved splay and a moulded base, with a block in the
centre of the moulding on which is placed a skull, below it the name Pet.
Bennier
____________________
The nose on Mary Fermor's bust looks like it could do with some attention.
Attention should be paid to the form of the socles - variations of which appear on English and Netherlands busts of the 17th century.
I will hopefully post in more detail on the form of 17th and 18th century socles in the future.
This blog is very helpful and informative to find out the Cremation Urns for Sale.
ReplyDelete